Thanks a lot for your suggestion, but async looks to me a little "dangerous" don't you think? Regarding the kernel, I've seen that the new update in fedora's kernel will not change to the stable one. What do you suggest? Shall I compile the new kernel? I have to put this server on production soon and I dont't want my clients to get stuck like this ;( Thanks a lot anyway! j On 14/03/2011, at 19:36, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Judith Flo Gaya wrote: >> Can you help me on this? am I wrong in my supposition (is the patch >> really applied)? is it possible that my problem is somewhere else? >> > > The patch looks to be backported (per BZ comment). Meaning: It's already > upstream. The latest stable kernel (2.6.37) seems to have the patch[1] > albeit the code is vastly different. > > Have you tried setting "async" on the NFS server shares? I have had to > do that on my systems. Everything gets bogged down in large gigabyte > transfers if I don't. > > > [1] > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=fs/nfs/inode.c;h=e67e31c734163c6fe6c0eef0d338a2b87ae55763;hb=3c0eee3fe6a3a1c745379547c7e7c904aa64f6d5#l498 > -- > users mailing list > users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
