On 2/12/11 9:02 AM, Darr wrote: > On Friday, February 11, 2011 @23:22 zulu, > Fernando Cassia<fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> scribed: > > =b=e=g=i=n==p=a=s=t=e=s= > > From: Fernando Cassia<fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> > Precedence: list > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Cc: "fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx"<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: Community support for Fedora users<users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > References:<4D54534B.7060309@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > In-Reply-To:<4D54534B.7060309@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:49:24 -0300 > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users<users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID:<AANLkTinuc1AgXbKH6-iTPZmcNS7gJZ1P=jJJoWc=Zxv9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Subject: Re: No need for AV tools on Linux, eh? > Message: 7 > > You must have received a couple bounce messages then. He won't. The address is forwarded to the new mailing list. Thus duplicates are created. > Above are the complete messages with headers from both of them as they > appeared in Digest, Vol 84, Issue 32. > Note they were message #'s 7 and 8 in the digest. > > Perhaps the messages to fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx are scrubbed from the email > list (the duplicate/CC does not appear in the web archive), but they are > both sent to the digest. Yes, Mailman should recognize them as duplicates and drop them. Sometimes, it does not. James McKenzie -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
