On 01/23/2011 08:44 AM, Parshwa Murdia wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 11:29 AM, JB<jb.1234abcd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> SELinux is a dangerous software, by its faulty design, and thus more so >> in the context of security, which is supposed to provide. > > It is faulty or not I don't know, but at least, I can say that it > should dangerous software. Why don't there is an option like, if you > wish you can enable SELinux, might be other distros having (I don't > have idea). > Please note that the OP gave no evidence or reasons to back up his assertion that SELinux's design is faulty. Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence and, until it's offered, this is just Argument By Assertion and can be dismissed as FUD. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
