On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Tom Horsley <horsley1953@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:32:34 +0100As far as I'm concerned they are both intensely user-hostile.
Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> A very basic thing I would like to ask if KDE is more user friendly
> then GNOME desktop?
They insist on changing the way everything works and is laid out
on a regular basis, so your most frequent impression is "What
the Hell?!"
My philosophy:
http://home.comcast.net/~tomhorsley/wisdom/stick/stick.html
--
Lol yeah that sounds about right.
They both have their strong points IMO. I was a GNOME user for a long time and later switched to KDE.
GNOME has a simplicity thing about it that makes it easier to use sometimes. But if you're a die-hard GNOME user
and then switch to KDE and really give it a chance, I think you'll find that KDE has a lot of nice features that GNOME just
doesn't have. And I don't mean just eye-candy stuff (although KDE's menus, etc. are easier on the eyes and look more modern).
Like for example, if you do any programming, and you like to use a GUI text editor sometimes,
compare the features of Gedit to Kate...
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
