Re: pure number allowed as username in the useradd command?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 02 December 2010 21:02:17 Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 18:10 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
> > Can somebody explain why pure numbers are allowed for username in the
> > useradd command?
> > 
> > sudo useradd 123456789
> > 
> > is not rejected!
> > 
> > As is known, this leads to big problems if referring to such a user and
> > the username differs from the userid: should such a username be
> > interpreted as username or userid?

I am by no means an expert on this, but AFAIK all scripts and apps have (or at 
least should have) a well-defined input semantics. IOW, no script should try to 
be "smart" and heuristically guess whether you provided a username or a userid 
in the input. It should always expect *only* *one* of these two.

Now, if it expects a username, once you provide it the script will look it up 
in /etc/passwd to find a corresponding userid. In this case there is no problem 
with username being completely numeric.

If the script expects a userid, once you provide it it will use it, and either 
ignore the username (if it is not important) or look it up in /etc/passwd (if 
it is important). In this case there is also no problem with the username 
being completely numeric.

The only problematic situation may arise if the script does not have a well-
defined input rules, and can expect either the username or userid, and then try 
to guess what you have entered, based on the contents and the context. In this 
case confusion can arise. But I would say that such kind of a script has a bug 
and should be fixed, rather than that numeric usernames should be forbidden.

There is no conceptual problem with having numeric usernames, as long as each 
app knows exactly what input to expect, and use /etc/passwd to make a proper 
map from username to userid and vice versa. Any app which doesn't know exactly 
what input to expect is just broken, simply put. If you encounter such an app 
or script, file a bug against it.

So I guess 12345 should be a valid username as any other, and useradd 
correctly allows for creation of such usernames. No bug there.

P.S. A bit of heuristic thinking: numeric usernames are a very elementary 
thing to consider, and if they were not supposed to exist, wrong useradd 
behavior would have been spotted and corrected a looooong time ago. ;-)

HTH, :-)
Marko

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux