On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 18:29 +0000, Beartooth wrote: > What it installed there doesn't even resemble the xorg.conf on > my #1 PC (which is still running F12). In particular, under Section > "Monitor" the new file has : > > Section "Monitor" > Identifier "Monitor0" > VendorName "Monitor Vendor" > ModelName "Monitor Model" > where the old file on #1 has The (above) being the sort of thing you expect when the EDID can't be read, because it is connected through a KVM, for instance. A generic entry. > Section "Monitor" > Identifier "Monitor0" > ModelName "LCD Panel 1680x1050" > HorizSync 31.5 - 65.5 > VertRefresh 56.0 - 65.0 > Option "dpms" > EndSection And what you'd expect when the EDID can be read. An entry related to the particular monitor. You didn't say whether, for this test, you had gone to the trouble of repatching your monitor, or left it running through your KVM. Surely, one of these days, someone's going to create a KVM that clones the details of the monitor's EDID to all the computer monitor ports? -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
