On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Piscium <groknok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7 November 2010 21:58, Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Piscium <groknok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 7 November 2010 21:40, Piscium <groknok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> This seems to indicate that interaction with the community was not >>>> going well, or else that the OO team was so small that need not have >>>> time to examine and take a small patch. >>> >>> Correction: "need not" should be "did not". >> >> When youÂre a corporate employee, bugs reported by customers take >> precedence over the "small fixes". >> >> In other words, if you have an angry paying customer yelling on the >> phone that your Âapplication "x" is crashing or losing data, be sure >> that those kind of bugs will be worked on before everything else... > > So you are saying that the community is better off now that > LibreOffice exists, because since there will not be any paying > customer for it (it's free after all) developers will have time to > listen to the community. For small bug fixes, yes, thereÂs chances that LO will fix those faster. For complex architectural decisions and re-engineering.... itÂll be interesting to watch who does what better. Not to mention what I said in the beginning... Oracle wants to integrate Java into OO.o and someone here already said that LOÂs idea is replacing the existing java hooks with native code. FC FC -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
