Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/4/2010 4:05 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:

> Also, feel free to ask the devs *why* they made the switch,
> they may just be willing to explain and give you arguments that would persuade
> you it's the right thing to do.
>    
I think that is what the OP is asking, judging from the thread title.  I 
haven't seen such an answer from a developer yet.  Perhaps it's a 
political decision, involving the differences between "free" and 
"open-source" software.  Or, perhaps the new product is just more useful 
to more people.  But, programmers aren't necessarily the best judge of 
that.  I don't think it's a matter of either you know more than the 
developers, or less.  Different people have different skill sets and needs.

I know that there are tools out there for building packages from source 
code, and I wouldn't think you necessarily have to be an "uber-geek 
programmer" to use them.  You may not even have to write a single line 
of code.  People can contribute to the free/open-source community in a 
variety of ways, depending on both their skills and their willingness.  
Right now I'm at the low end on both counts, so I wouldn't feel 
comfortable ranting about how this or that decision on the part of the 
developers sucks, but I've seen it here (not saying on this thread).  If 
the distro isn't exactly what you want it to be, it makes a lot of sense 
for someone to suggest you roll up your sleeves and make it so (a luxury 
you have only to a very limited extent with proprietary software), or 
contribute to that end in some way.  But I don't think it's quite right 
to say you *have* to do it in order for your criticisms to be taken 
seriously.  A gifted artist may be trying to do something in Gimp the 
programmers never even thought of, for example, even if she couldn't 
program "hello, world".   But if your argument is simply that you trust 
Oracle more than Novell I agree it probably won't be taken very seriously.

So if you really must have your OO package for Fedora in the future, 
have at it.  There must be a few people who both care enough about it 
and have the necessary skills.  If not, well, that's how the community 
votes here.  Of course, they could also build and install it on their 
own systems from the source code and the rest of the community be 
damned.  That also is a valid choice.  For myself, I'm grateful there 
are enough people willing to put together a system I can just download 
and install for free, without contributing much other than an occasional 
bug report or helping out the rare user who is less knowledgeable than me.

My $.02.


-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux