On 10/13/2010 05:39 PM, Claude Jones wrote: > On 10/13/2010 8:30 PM, JD wrote: >>> that package is already installed on my system - I'm not sure why you >>>> thought it would fix the nouveau.dri.so problem - from what I've read, >>>> this has to do with an as yet unsupported functionality in nouveau, and >>>> isn't a real error - am I wrong? >>>> >> I did not say it will solve your problem. Read my reply please. >> I said "Not that it will matter much ...." >> Furthermore, if you do have the package, then why is this >> message in the log: >> >>>[ 35.500] (II) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib64/dri/nouveau_dri.so >>>>>> > > failed ( : cannot open shared object file: >>>>>> > > No such file or directory) >> So, where is the library, if you have the package installed? >> What does >> ls -l /usr/lib64/dri/nouveau_dri.so >> output? >> > I did read your reply, and I asked a question. What does the mesa > package have to do with nouveau? I just don't understand the > relationship - I don't understand why an error message regarding a > missing nouveau driver will be satisfied by installation of a mesa > driver package? > Whatever driver you currently DO have, is asking for it. So if you WANT to address the error in your log for a missing library, then you need to install that library. It is that simple. I am not saying it will solve your problem. But at least, eliminate one source of error. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
