On Wednesday October 13 2010 20:40:05 JD wrote: > On 10/13/2010 11:24 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Dj YB<yehielb@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> tried the fedora-kde list first but got no response. > >> > >> whenever I look at the processes table I see that kglobalaccel is taking > >> about 125 MB of memory, that is a lot. > >> I admit that I have lot's of shortcuts and gestures, but still, is that > >> number normal? > > > > Determining how much memory is used by a single PID is tricky. In the > > case of KDE, which has a lot of shared code, it's even trickier. Much > > of the memory footprint seen in ps might be in libraries shared by > > other KDE apps on the system. > > Yehiel, what is the RSS (Resident Set Size) for kglobalaccel ? PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 2480 djyb 20 0 183m 127m 4048 S 0.0 12.7 0:49.64 kglobalaccel according to top, 127m, I guess that 127MB -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
