On 10/02/2010 11:30 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 11:18 -0700, JD wrote: >> Not to be mean or anything....So please take it lightly: >> Did I say linux has issues in supporting large smp? NO! >> You are answering your own question. not mine. > ... > >> Did I say anything about application support? No! >> Again, you are answering your own question. >> >> I have found a few articles mentioning the smp granularity, >> but do not discuss the linux smp implementation within the >> context of granularity and overhead, and optimum degree >> of granularity. > Might be a language barrier on my part, but by your question, it wasn't > apparent (at least not to me) if you're talking the locking granularity > inside the Linux kernel (read: A theoretical question) or application > performance running on Linux. > As you talked about actual hardware (AMD Opteron CPU with 12 cores), I > -assumed- that you were talking about application performance. > > -However-, saying "Taking it lightly" doesn't excuse you from "being > excellent to each other" rule. Your answer was rude and uncalled for. > > - Gilboa > Sorry, Gilboa. I felt that you were mis-steering the gist of my question. Have a nice day! -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
