Andre, > Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:37:54 +0000 (UTC) > From: Andre Robatino<robatino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 14 Beta!! > To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID:<loom.20100929T113302-892@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Philip Rhoades<phil<at> pricom.com.au> writes: > >> Fedora-14-Beta-i686-Live-XFCE.iso has the same cksum as Beta RC3? > > Beta is identical to Beta RC3. In general, for each of Alpha, Beta, and Final, > one of the corresponding release candidates is chosen (usually, but not > necessarily, the last one). You can verify this by comparing the unsigned > checksum files for Beta RC3 with the corresponding signed ones for Beta. The > only difference is the signature. Isn't that an odd thing to do? I would have thought that the point of having different pre-final release versions, including release candidates, is to progressively improve the version ie reduce bugs - as it gets closer to a final release? Thanks for the info though . . Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
