On 09/18/2010 10:39 AM, David Boles wrote: > On 9/18/2010 1:14 PM, JD wrote: >> >> On 09/18/2010 10:03 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 16:05:11 +0000, >>> JB<jb.1234abcd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Fedora doesn't have infinite resources. Not doing things to save resources >>> is a good reason. >>> >>> There is a process by which people can support other architectures. If enough >>> people that care enough to do the actual work involved with maintaining >>> a secondary architecture work to make it happen, there could be an i586 >>> and/or i486 secondary architecture. >> Well, what is involved in building of Fedora for the i386 arch >> other than an automated script that sets the gcc options to >> compile for the i386 architecture? >> Is that really all that much work? > > I would think that Fedora would be more than happy if you performed the > work and provided the server(s) and HD space. > > So when can we expect to see the fruits of your efforts? :-) > > You've already seen my reply. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
