On 09/18/2010 04:22 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > a while back, i noted on fedora 12 that it seemed impossible to try > to run NFS exclusively in version 4 mode: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552144 > > i just noted the same thing on centos/rhel 5.5. that is, if i edit > /etc/sysconfig/nfs and uncomment the lines: > > MOUNTD_NFS_V1="no" > MOUNTD_NFS_V2="no" > MOUNTD_NFS_V3="no > > i would have thought that this would mean that i'm trying to use NFSv4 > exclusively. but if i try that, i still get that same error from > mountd on rhel as i did on fedora. > > i've verified that, to get around it, i simply need to advertise at > least one of those earlier versions, doesn't matter which one. so, > according to red hat's jeff layton, that's still a bug in mountd, > correct? I don't know, as I haven't checked, since.... > and in a larger context, if you had control over an entire network > in terms of NFS both client and servers, is it feasible to run the > entire network using only NFSv4? thanks. > > In the larger context I do have control over an entire network (5 servers, 8 clients) and all they use are NFSv4. I think that qualifies as feasible. -- You have taken yourself too seriously. 葛斯克 愛德華 / 台北市八德路四段
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
