On 09/15/2010 04:50 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:21:44 -0700, JD wrote: > >> >> On 09/15/2010 03:10 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:43:37 -0700, JD wrote: >>> >>>>> Recently, even the nss.pc pkgconfig file's automatic Provides disappeared >>>>> unexpectedly(?) because of some %global definitions in the spec file for >>>>> specific minimum versions of build requirements. >>>> On my F13, I have >>>> nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.7-3.fc13.i686 >>>> nss_ldap-264-10.fc13.i686 >>>> nss-3.12.7-4.fc13.i686 >>>> nss_db-2.2.3-0.3.pre1.fc13.i686 >>>> nss-softokn-devel-3.12.7-3.fc13.i686 >>>> nss-mdns-0.10-8.fc12.i686 >>>> nss_compat_ossl-0.9.6-1.fc13.i686 >>>> nss-util-3.12.7-2.fc13.i686 >>>> nss-sysinit-3.12.7-4.fc13.i686 >>>> nss-softokn-3.12.7-3.fc13.i686 >>>> nss-tools-3.12.7-4.fc13.i686 >>>> >>>> >>>> and >>>> >>>> yum check >>>> >>>> does not flag any missing dependenceies . >>> You cannot have any missing dependencies with packages that are >>> installed already. >> Well, that begs the question: how did these packages get installed >> on my system when I did not specifically install them individually? > Rephrasing the question might be helpful. What exactly do you want > to have explained? The thread started with the explanation that installation of nss has broken dependencies. So, if the dependencies are broken, how did yum resolve these dependencies and install all these packages? -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
