--- On Thu, 9/9/10, JD <jd1008@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/09/2010 05:29 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > [snip] > > IIRC, CentOS 5, the latest version, as well as > Scientific Linux, too, is based off FC6. That's not > all that far removed from 4, is it? Although, as I > recall, FC6 worked so well, for me anyway, compared to the > previous releases (I had been upgrading every version since > FC3, the first "good" release IMO) that I used both the > 32-bit and 64-bit versions on two different machines for > almost 2 years before upgrading. > > > > B > > I worked in a place that used FC3 (Redhat 7 ??) as the > platform for > building their embedded products. Perhaps the reason was, > as you state, > "FC3, the first "good" release IMO". > > Anyhow, the op that wants to upgrade the compiler is going > to > face a truckload of dependency problems. I agree: The OP may be whipping a dead horse by trying to build from current source. It will be a nightmare, if it succeeds at all. B -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
