On 08/31/2010 05:31 PM, kalinix wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 17:04 -0700, JD wrote: > >>> In this particulary case, why not just an evolution --force-shutdown? >>> This will shutdown evolution-data-server. As simple as that. >> Is this thread only about evolution updates? >> > the OP complained about two components, which happened to be evolution > related. And moreover, the second component, libgtkhtml only deals with > evolution itself, not even the data-server. So I gave him a simpler > solution to avoid from entering runlevel 1 and then re-entering runlevel > 5 (geez, you always do this when you update your system?). That's why I > wrote in my post "in this particular case". > > But of course, if you think that finding which daemon should be updated, > killing it and then restarting (as linux always worked, even before the > fancy, candy-eyed, gui apps that make it looks like crappy windows) is a > little bit overkill, a simple reboot would save you from this pain. As a > matter of fact, those gui apps were meant exactly for this. > > BTW, this reminded me to reboot to load the latest kernel... I was 4 > releases behind ;) Ala tha OP that compared linux to windows as far as the frequent reboots required after updates: perhaps Linux should be renamed Winux :) :) Just kidding :) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
