Re: SELinux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Sent: Aug 31, 2010 8:43 AM
>To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: SELinux
>
>On 08/31/2010 05:32 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 00:14:09 +0900,
>>    Takehiko Abe<keke@xxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>> ;;; sorry other one goes straight to you
>>>
>>>   >  Linus is not exactly famous for his ability to understand security
>>>   >  concepts. I find the fact your argument is produced by google and
>>>   >  cut/paste rather than technical material ... enlightening
>>>
>>> Well, please educate me. All I hear from advocates is "more security"
>>> without a concrete example. You mentioned the danger of emails get
>>> stolen without SELinux. Please give me the scenario. So we can gauge
>>> the risk.
>>
>> If you read email you need selinux. If you read email with a client that
>> fires up plugins to read special content (e.g. html, pdfs, flash) then you
>> really need selinux.
>>
>> If you use a web browser to view more than a short list of trusted sites,
>> you need selinux.
>>
>> If you run network services accessible from outside the machine then you
>> need selinux.
>>
>> If you run binaries from semitrusted groups (this includes most commercial
>> software) then you need selinux.
>
>You don't _need_ SELinux in any such cases.

I disagree, but that is just my nature.  If you wander off onto a malware site, you really need SeLinux in that case.
>
>SELinux is aiming at catching malfunctioning/misbehaving programs and 
>_may_ prevent damage in use-cases such as those you list.
>
>However, SELinux also causes mal-functions and prevents applications 
>from operating properly. Semi-educated tweaking SELinux may even cause 
>further damage up to rendering systems completely unusable.
>
>To me this means: If the defaults work, use it. If it doesn't, switch it 
>off, otherwise you might easily shoot yourself into the foot.
>
If you don't know what you are doing with SeLinux it is very easy to misconfigure it and lock up a system.  If you don't know what you are doing, now is the time to ask for help, not trapse off and try it on your own.  SeLinux is VERY unforgiving and that is what most people fear about it.  Remember, it is a Security system first.

That is why folks are so scared of it.  Sort of like the 'big black cave reported to have a big black bear in it.'  Bring a flashlight (knowledge) and you are ok.  Walk in without one, and you are lunch (and so is your system.)

Yes, you should have SeLinux or some other security system installed on any system that is connected to the Internet.  It is the 'big black cave' we all should respect, not fear.

James McKenzie


-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux