>> Likewise for people vehemently advocating to disable SELinux, I view
>> them with a great deal of suspicion. Is it simply they really do not
>> like it, or do they have ulterior motives?
>
> Neither. Initially, when trying to use it, they typically notice
> something stops working. Then, when trying to make it work, they get
> lost in arcane and cryptic tools.
You forgot the crucial point. Namely that SELinux is not necessary
for most.
btw I don't know who "vehemently advocating to disable
SELinux". Rather it is "I don't need it" or its variations -- all very
smooth and mild like the Theodore Tso's comment I quoted in the first
place. I quote one more from the same thread. This one is from Linus:
"I find SELinux to be so irrelevant to my usage that I don't use
it at all"
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/2/353
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
