Re: faster /dev/random

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>>> Is there an approved way to increase the speed at which the random pool
>>> for /dev/random fills up?  I'm playig with dnssec and getnerating 2k rsa
>>> keys is taking up to 3 hours.  I've been googling a bit and Intel x86_64
>>> machines seem to have random number hardware built in (perhaps also
>>> AMD???)  Is there a way to funnel this into the entropy pool?
>>>
>> To be honest, I thought the data from the TCO random generator was funneled in 
>> already. That's what the "intel-rng" module does.
>>
>> Current kernel built with:
>> CONFIG_HW_RANDOM=y
>> CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TIMERIOMEM=m
>> CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_INTEL=m
>> CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_AMD=m
>> CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_GEODE=m
>> CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_VIA=m
>> CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_VIRTIO=m
> 
> Thanks.  That gave me a few good strings to google for.
> 
>> If your CPU has the hardware the module should be loaded, but you can
>> check with "lsmod | grep rng" to be sure, or load manually to
>> test. Also virtio_rng might be useful. You might have to load by hand
>> to test, then config to load by default if you want.
> 
> It turns out my (2 year old) AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core doesn't seem to
> have that module loaded.  In fact, googling for "AMD hardware random
> number generator" got me a few hits of folks running an ms-windows tool
> on similar processors and one of the flags checked was for the hardware
> rng, which always seemed to be "not supported".  I guess the modern CPU
> really don't have that hardware any more.  How strange (and sad!).
> 
I haven't looked into what virtio-rng does, but it does load on anything I can 
quickly test, and I doubt it will make your number any worse.

There are number of cheap USB rng units around which are supported, I just read 
about one in Rich Jones' fine blog,
  http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/usb-hardware-random-number-generator/
which will probably get you started. His analysis is worth reading if only to 
see that some people still have pride in their product.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux