Athmane Madjoudj wrote: > On 08/11/2010 11:09 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> On a machine with hardware virtual support, currently using qemu-kvm >> for VMs, is there a use for kqemu at all? And is it still useful to >> improve support on machines which lack hardware virtual, such as p4 and >> similar? >> > > I was a former user of qemu/kqemu before the merge of QEMU/KVM in F11, > according to bug #520284 [1] the upstream said that kqemu is unmaintainable. > Given that RPMfusion still offers it, I would say that the developers have the latest hardware and the budget that implies, and regard two years old as not worth supporting. > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520284 > > HTH > Helps greatly. The hardware we got three years ago which ran fine up through FC9 and which was specified particularly to run Linux now has had xen, kqemu, and older Radeon support removed by the time we got to FC13. Fedora is cutting edge, replace the distro every six months, obviously replace the hardware at that time, too. Time to go in another direction. -- Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
