Re: OTish :D Colors of Cases for Fedora was: Re: Open Letter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:30 -0400, Robert Myers wrote:
>> For computers, the color of the case is probably not an important
>> consideration with respect to thermal management.  For spacecraft and
>> even for the roof of a house, it is.  For the understanding of
>> physics, labeling something so fundamental as Kirchoff's Law as a
>> "theoretical absurdity" is unhelpful.
>
> No, it's this thread about computer casing colouring that I was
> labelling.
>
> We used to have these sorts of arguments in college (studying
> electronics), many many years ago.  The theorists would intricately
> calculate the inefficiency of the transformer, to work out which ones
> they should put in a power supply.  The rest of us would have a quick
> look at the specs sheet, and pick one that could handle the current and
> a few volts more.
>
> ... the absurdity of getting bogged down in theory for insignificant
> gain.
>

I guess we all have our hot-buttons.  Being able to sort out quickly
what's important and what's not is an important qualification for
success in almost any discipline.  When the physics are crisp, though,
and the discussion makes a muddle of the physics, it always seems
worthwhile at least to point out that the physics are well-understood,
especially if the discussion has headed in the direction of confusion
instead of clarity.

A really clear explanation of the basic physics would require an
extensive journey through lots of non-trivial material, and there is
no way you can explain to a ninth-grader things that puzzled the
world's best physicists at the beginning of the Twentieth Century.
The history of unraveling those mysteries was a not insignificant
chapter in seeing that classical mechanics had profound problems that
ultimately would be fixed by quantum mechanics.

This isn't a physics forum, and I don't want to turn it into one, but,
with sufficient curiosity and Google, a proper answer to the question
that was raised would make an interesting journey through big slices
of modern physics (and mathematics, for that matter).  If I have
succeeded in making just one person productively curious, I think the
off-topic bandwidth is justified.

Robert.
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux