On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:45 PM, JB <jb.123abc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > # yum list *system-config-firewall* [result] When I run this, that is, [root@localhost ~]# yum list *system-config-firewall* I get: Loaded plugins: protectbase, refresh-packagekit adobe-linux-i386 | 951 B 00:00 rpmfusion-free-updates | 2.8 kB 00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates | 2.8 kB 00:00 updates/metalink | 10 kB 00:00 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Installed Packages system-config-firewall.noarch 1.2.16-3.fc11 @updates system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-3.fc11 @updates You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root > [root@localhost jb]# yum deplist system-config-firewall [result] If I run this, that is, [root@localhost ~]# yum deplist system-config-firewall I get: Loaded plugins: protectbase, refresh-packagekit 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Finding dependencies: package: system-config-firewall.noarch 1.2.16-3.fc11 dependency: pygtk2-libglade provider: pygtk2-libglade.i586 2.14.1-1.fc11 provider: pygtk2-libglade.i586 2.14.1-2.fc11 dependency: python provider: python.i586 2.6-7.fc11 provider: python.i586 2.6-12.fc11 dependency: config(system-config-firewall) = 1.2.16-3.fc11 provider: system-config-firewall.noarch 1.2.16-3.fc11 dependency: gtk2 >= 2.6 provider: gtk2.i586 2.16.1-4.fc11 provider: gtk2.i586 2.16.6-2.fc11 dependency: /usr/bin/python provider: python.i586 2.6-7.fc11 provider: python.i586 2.6-12.fc11 dependency: hicolor-icon-theme provider: hicolor-icon-theme.noarch 0.10-6 dependency: pygtk2 provider: pygtk2.i586 2.14.1-1.fc11 provider: pygtk2.i586 2.14.1-2.fc11 dependency: /bin/sh provider: bash.i586 4.0-6.fc11 provider: bash.i586 4.0-9.fc11 dependency: usermode-gtk >= 1.94 provider: usermode-gtk.i586 1.100-2 dependency: system-config-firewall-tui = 1.2.16-3.fc11 provider: system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-3.fc11 package: system-config-firewall.noarch 1.2.16-2.fc11 dependency: pygtk2-libglade provider: pygtk2-libglade.i586 2.14.1-1.fc11 provider: pygtk2-libglade.i586 2.14.1-2.fc11 dependency: gtk2 >= 2.6 provider: gtk2.i586 2.16.1-4.fc11 provider: gtk2.i586 2.16.6-2.fc11 dependency: python provider: python.i586 2.6-7.fc11 provider: python.i586 2.6-12.fc11 dependency: config(system-config-firewall) = 1.2.16-2.fc11 provider: system-config-firewall.noarch 1.2.16-2.fc11 dependency: system-config-firewall-tui = 1.2.16-2.fc11 provider: system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-2.fc11 dependency: /usr/bin/python provider: python.i586 2.6-7.fc11 provider: python.i586 2.6-12.fc11 dependency: hicolor-icon-theme provider: hicolor-icon-theme.noarch 0.10-6 dependency: pygtk2 provider: pygtk2.i586 2.14.1-1.fc11 provider: pygtk2.i586 2.14.1-2.fc11 dependency: /bin/sh provider: bash.i586 4.0-6.fc11 provider: bash.i586 4.0-9.fc11 dependency: usermode-gtk >= 1.94 provider: usermode-gtk.i586 1.100-2 > [root@localhost jb]# yum deplist system-config-firewall-tui [result] When I run this, that is, [root@localhost ~]# yum deplist system-config-firewall-tui I get: Loaded plugins: protectbase, refresh-packagekit 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Finding dependencies: package: system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-2.fc11 dependency: libselinux >= 1.19.1 provider: libselinux.i586 2.0.80-1.fc11 dependency: newt provider: newt.i586 0.52.10-3.fc11 provider: newt.i586 0.52.10-4.fc11 dependency: /usr/bin/python provider: python.i586 2.6-7.fc11 provider: python.i586 2.6-12.fc11 dependency: iptables >= 1.2.8 provider: iptables.i586 1.4.3.1-1.fc11 dependency: rhpl provider: rhpl.i586 0.221-1 dependency: system-config-network-tui provider: system-config-network-tui.noarch 1.5.97-1.fc11 dependency: config(system-config-firewall-tui) = 1.2.16-2.fc11 provider: system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-2.fc11 dependency: iptables-ipv6 provider: iptables-ipv6.i586 1.4.3.1-1.fc11 package: system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-3.fc11 dependency: libselinux >= 1.19.1 provider: libselinux.i586 2.0.80-1.fc11 dependency: config(system-config-firewall-tui) = 1.2.16-3.fc11 provider: system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-3.fc11 dependency: newt provider: newt.i586 0.52.10-3.fc11 provider: newt.i586 0.52.10-4.fc11 dependency: /usr/bin/python provider: python.i586 2.6-7.fc11 provider: python.i586 2.6-12.fc11 dependency: iptables >= 1.2.8 provider: iptables.i586 1.4.3.1-1.fc11 dependency: rhpl provider: rhpl.i586 0.221-1 dependency: system-config-network-tui provider: system-config-network-tui.noarch 1.5.97-1.fc11 dependency: iptables-ipv6 provider: iptables-ipv6.i586 1.4.3.1-1.fc11 > If the above verification does not result in finding a discrepancy, you > basically should drop your F11 installation as not trustworthy (for whatever > reason: you got that iso from a funny source, perhaps you used outside repos, > you could have been hacked, whatever ...). > F11 has reached an end-of-life point anyway (no official support/updates) and > considering that Fedora is a fast moving target with frequent releases, it is > rather advantageous for all of us "fanboyz" to move on to debug the next > one. Should there be any discrepancy? Or would it mean really to reinstall this fedora 11, never preffered! -- Regards, Parshwa Murdia -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
