On 07/20/2010 10:54 AM, Frank Elsner wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:55:02 -0700 JD wrote: >> On 07/20/2010 08:28 AM, Frank Elsner wrote: >>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:12:29 -0500 (CDT) lxnf98mm@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>> I added a wireless card to a machine that has no gui interface installed, so no NM >>>> I configured wpa_supplicant and wlan startup script >>>> What I do not get is when the machine boots wpa_supplicant starts after the network script >>> "after" is the problem. wpa_supplicant must start *before" network. >>> Change the sequence. >>> >>> >>> --Frank Elsner >> I have done this numerous times. >> Then an update will come and reset the sequence so that in run >> level 5, S10network will be executed before S23wpa-supplicant. >> >> But this has NOT caused any problems for me since I changed >> my ifcfg-ra0 to use a static IP address instead of dynamic. > I had no problems with dynamic IPs for interface wlan0 :-) > >> All S10network is doing is simply ifconfig'ing the network interfaces. >> The problems will occur if you interface is configured to get it's >> IP address dynamically, per /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-$INTERFACE >> >> That said, I have found the DHCP over wireless does not work for >> for me at all - ifconfig is never able to obtain an address. So I used >> static IP. Now it does not matter which one starts first. > Ups, you should analyze your dhclient problems and fix it. > Dynamic IPs are quite usual in WLANs. > > > --Frank Elsner I think the problem is in the router. It is an at&t uverse router. Even the windows machines cannot get a dhcp brokered address over wireless. So I set all 3 windows machines to static ip's as well. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
