On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Err... yes. When you talk intellectual property in software, you talk patents. So what's the patent that could possibly pretend that you can't replace "this" with "that". You need to find "this" in a list, that provide the correction "that". Are there many more basic exercises in programming?
Have you heard that OOo 3.2.1 solves this problem? I hope the tab will be removed before the final release! Man, patents on an equivalence list!
On 07/16/2010 05:27 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:I have no specific knowledge in this case but perhaps patents
> Is there any word (that you've heard by rumor) that indicates what the
> possible immediate intellectual property problem may be? The bug
> report doesn't specify anything.
Err... yes. When you talk intellectual property in software, you talk patents. So what's the patent that could possibly pretend that you can't replace "this" with "that". You need to find "this" in a list, that provide the correction "that". Are there many more basic exercises in programming?
Have you heard that OOo 3.2.1 solves this problem? I hope the tab will be removed before the final release! Man, patents on an equivalence list!
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
