Re: Reply-To munging summary (was: Bug in mailing lists; unfriendly to non-subscribers)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11Jul2010 01:06, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Tom H <tomh0665@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Felipe Contreras
| > <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| >> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| >>> In my opinion, many lists set the reply-to address because those lists
| >>> are intended to keep replies on the list, and the list managers know
| >>> that most people wouldn't do that if it wasn't preset for them.  People
| >>> will just hit reply, and expect it to do the right thing.
| >>
| >> I wonder, how do you think people are able to maintain private
| >> conversations between multiple parties if they "will just hit reply"?
| >
| > I regularly have conversations with multiple friends or colleagues
| > where at some point someone hits "reply" rather than "reply to all"
| > and all but two are cut off.
| 
| Exactly, so common users need to know "reply to all" in order to have
| conversations with more than one person. It is *common* knowledge.
| 
| So members of the mailing list are aware of such "reply to all" common
| knowledge.

It may be common knowledge. It is not reflexive behaviour. People reach for
plain reply by habit. Happens all the time, very common.

Personally I think mail readers should have buttons labelled "Reply" (meaning
reply-to-all) and "Reply only to author" (meaning what the button labelled
"reply" usually mean now).

It is _usually_ better to reply-to-all in ad hoc groups like the above
example, and also better to reply-to-all in one-to-one conversation
(where the buttons mean the same thing).

So I, for one, would advocate going back in time and changing the
"default" reply button's meaning. Then the situation that _drives_ the
common list configuration of the reply-to would not be as prevalent.

Cheers,
-- 
Cameron Simpson <cs@xxxxxxxxxx> DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/

Generally, these things are dreadful, but I saw a clip the other night on tv
of someone who had built a scorpion costume for their spaniel, complete with
legs and a stinger.  It was quite impressive.  Made me want to run out and
buy a dog and a some foam rubber.       - David Farley
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux