Re: Bug in mailing lists; unfriendly to non-subscribers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 20:13 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> Fact: the current system doesn't allow cross-posting
>
> Nothing in the current system prevents cross-posting. It's explicitly
> discouraged by the list Guidelines, but as we know some people do it
> (and usually get jumped on).

It's not totally prevented; but it's basically impossible.

When you sand mail to say 10 mailing lists that munge replies; each
person that replies to the mail would have to manually change the
munged recipient the the 10 mailing lists.

This obviously doesn't happen; in practice and each mailing lists ends
with a different thread, and sometimes the threads get messed up when
a person is multiple mailing lists and replies properly to all of
them.

It is just a huge horrible mess; no wonder it's discouraged.

But if you don't have reply munging, nor require subscription;
cross-posting Just Works. People do that regularly on linux-kernel,
linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel, etc.

> The rationale is that you should decide
> where best to send your query and send it only to that list.

mails != queries

> Cross-posting makes it all but impossible to keep threads coherent when
> multiple replies appear from different lists, and not everyone is seeing
> the same conversation.

Everything's coherent if the replies are not munged.

When I send a mail to 3 mls (linux-kernel, linux-omap and
linux-arm-kernel) any time *anybody* replies to any of those lists,
the reply will be posted on all 3 lists. If there's a second level
reply of a person that's not subscribed in one of those lists there
would be a slight delay when the mail is moderated, but the person of
the 1st level reply would receive the mail immediately anyway because
he remains in the Cc (not munged), and the 3rd level reply would
appear to everybody again.

This works just fine.

Unless replies are munged and mailing lists are subscriber-only, then
yes, it's a horrible mess.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux