Re: Bug in mailing lists; unfriendly to non-subscribers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Tom H <tomh0665@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Felipe Contreras
>> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Orthogonal to this is that the mailing lists should not mingle with
>>> "Reply-To"; they should leave the To and Cc fields intact, so that the
>>> MUA can reply to the right addresses. See:
>>> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>>>
>>> This way when a non-subscriber posts something, he doesn't have to add
>>> the "Please CC me as I'm not in the mailing list"; it will happen
>>> automatically.
>>
>> I couldn't disagree more.
>>
>> Posting to the list: If someone wants to benefit from a list, the
>> least that he/she should do is subscribe. I delete systematically any
>> email with "please cc me as I'm not subscribed to the list".
>
> So you are saying that all the people that post to the mailing list
> are doing so to benefit themselves, and not to help the community?

No. I am saying that if you are not willing to subscribe, you are not,
AFAIC, part of the community.


>> Replying to the list: I want the lust to "mangle" the headers so that
>> I can hit "reply" and have the email go the list and not to the person
>> to whom I am replying.
>
> When you hit "reply to all" the mail will be sent to the mailing list,
> and the other person would receive the mail directly from you, and
> will know that the mail was directed to him (as a marker in Gmail, or
> mutt, etc.). Also it's nice to be able to search back mail:
> 'in:linux-kernel and to:felipe.contreras' and see actual results.
>
> Is it so much to ask for you to hit "reply to all" instead of "reply"
> (depending on the case), so that other people can have the benefits of
> non-munged headers?

On debian-user, hitting reply sends an email back to the poster and
there are two regular complaints.

1. Many people hit "reply" and don't send a reply to the list - and
the recipient then forwards the unintended private email back to the
list.

2. Many people hit "reply all" and the person they are replying to
complains that he/she has received two emails.

So non-munged headers create more problems that they are worth.
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux