On 06/11/2010 01:01 PM, Clodoaldo Neto wrote: > 2010/6/11 Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> On 06/11/2010 11:40 AM, Clodoaldo Neto wrote: >>> For me Flash 10.1 CPU utilization is very intense. Some videos have >>> many dropped frames. Right now this is almost unwatchable with more >>> than 95% CPU utilization: >>> >>> http://worldcup.vevo.com/ >> >> This is H.264 video, which is notoriously CPU intensive to decode. >> The new generation of computer/GPU hardware is being designed to do >> this with dedicated peripherals, but the flashplayer you have won't >> use that. Also, the built-in decoder in flashplayer might not be as >> fast as it could be. > > My point, which I neglected to post, is that with the previous Flash > version, 10.0, the CPU utilization was 20% at the most demanding > videos That certainly is not my experience. H.264 will stretch almost any processor, and in HD is beyond the capabilities of even the newest single core. 20% CPU utilization is pretty reasonable for MPEG decoding, though. I don't know what you might have tried in the past. > and with 10.1 it is unusable for some videos. My desktop CPU is an > AMD 2.2 GHz. Not very impressive, but also not that ancient. Well, the question is whether you can do better with an older flashplayer and *that particular video*, which seems to be SD widescreen. Andrew. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
