On 06/02/2010 08:31 PM, Mike Fedyk wrote: > Here is a sampling of the recent updates that have been pushed to > stable. There are more, I didn't look at every update. > > Released straight to stable: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdb-7.0.1-47.fc12 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ClanLib-2.1.1-1.fc12 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.5-1.fc12 > > Pushed to testing and then to stable a few days later with zero karma. > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bti-026-1.fc12 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vidalia-0.2.9-1.fc12 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EekBoek-2.00.02-1.fc12 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fsarchiver-0.6.10-1.fc12 > > Why are we still pushing to stable or submitting directly to stable > without people other than the packager testing it? I can't speak for the specific packages above, but I will sometimes push a package stable to Fedora N-1 that is identical to a package in Fedora N if the package in Fedora N got sufficient Karma. Maybe that's what happened here? -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
