Tim: >>> But, I can't see what could possibly be wrong with a filter such as >>> this: >>> >>> reply-to contains users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> move to folder lists/fedora >>> stop processing & Tim: >> Looking at the log, each filtered message takes at least 3 to 4 seconds >> to go through. That's tediously slow. jdow: > What "filter" are you running? What possessed you to run it inside > an email client? (What possessed Fedora to commit that atrocity?) Exactly the sort of filtering rule that I outlined above (one matching rule, one action). I'm on several mailing lists, and for many many years before running Linux, I would simply get my mail client to sort incoming mail into folders for each list, like that. None of them had any problems doing such a thing, and neither should Evolution. > If you are running SpamAssassin as a filter Definitely not, and I've explicitly said I don't do that. And I agree that you want it done elsewhere, if you're going to do it. Preferably at the first mail server that handles your mail (which really would be the ISP, but so few ISPs give you good configuration options if you do that). -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
