From: "Tim" <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, 2010/April/19 10:29
> On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 12:28 -0700, Michael Miles wrote:
>> If the virus definitions from Clamav is written for linux based
>> viruses and not windows based then what real good is it.
>> All virus definitions should be included with the scan
>> Especially if Wine and virtualbox are running on a linux system
>
> If you read the reviews of anti-virus software, from time to time, you
> will see that none of them are 100% effective. The last review I read
> came to the conclusion that the most effective checkers only managed to
> find about 60% of the viruses, and not all the same viruses. That is a
> pretty poor rating - just a bit less than half will get through.
The last time I ran though a complete rating of AV tools none of them were
as bad as you declare. Please enhance your assertions with facts not
fantasy. It makes your assertions stronger.
{^_^}
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
