On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Tom Horsley <horsley1953@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:34:38 +0300 (EEST) > Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > >> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules >> >> Look for NAME="eth0", NAME="eth1". > > Ah, but this all gets very Alice In Wonderland. The > names in the udev rules are the names of the "device", > the names of the "interface" can be different. > > If you are using the traditional "network" interface > then you may also need to fiddle the > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth* scripts > to have the right names and point to the right > hardware address. For the (strange) record - and on F13. I changed "/etc/udev/rules.d/70...net..." to associate my single NIC's MAC address to eth1 (instead of eth0, of course). I rebooted without changing ifcfg-eth0's name or contents; and my network was up and running. And "ifconfig" returned eth1. So NM must be ignoring ifcfg-eth0 or eth1 is using ifcfg-eth0 based on the HWADDR value in that file. Any other ideas? -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
