On 04/11/2010 01:28 PM, David L wrote: > I just started playing around with encfs and noticed > some behaviour that surprised me... not sure if > it's a bug or a bad design or if I have unreasonable > expectations. But if I mount a directory like this: > > encfs ~/.crypt ~/crypt > > Then start editing a file in ~/crypt... eg: > > emacs ~/crypt/foo & > > Then if I try to unmount the crypt directory, I'd > expect it to complain that it can't unmount it > because it is busy. But it happily lets me unmount > it. If I continue editing the file and save it, it creates > a new file in the empty mount point directory. > > Another thing I noticed is that the little desktop > icon that pops up when I mount the crypt directory > has a right click menu to unmount, but it gives > an error about it not being in fstab when I try > to unmount it that way. > > Are either or both of these bugs? > > Thanks, > From the encfs man page: CAVEATS EncFS is not a true filesystem. It does not deal with any of the actual storage or maintenance of files. It simply translates requests (encrypting or decrypting as necessary) and passes the requests through to the underlying host filesystem. Therefor any limitations of the host filesystem will likely be inherited by EncFS (or possibly be further limited). One such limitation is filename length. If your underlying filesystem limits you to N characters in a filename, then EncFS will limit you to approximately 3*(N-2)/4. For example if the host filesystem limits to 256 characters, then EncFS will be limited to 190 character filenames. This is because encrypted filenames are always longer then plaintext filenames. So, in the first case, the file man not be open, or the open file is most likely in the ~/.crypt folder, and not in the encfs mounted on ~/crypt. Some editors will open the file, read it, and close it again. It ten works with a temporary copy of the file. When you save the file, the original file is renamed as a backup, and the temporary file replaces it. In the second case, I think it is a matter of the umount command not knowing how to handle a fuse-mounted file system. Not so much a bug as an added feature that needs to be implemented so that umount knows to hand the unmount of encfs off to fusermount. Just my WAG Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
