On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 15:35 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: > Yes, NM is quite good, but a complete and utter lack of docs for it is > a major problem, and it appears the people working on it aren't > willing to farm the creation of docs out. I know. I offered to do it > at least four times and was met with a deafening silence each time. I agree with the "for"s and "against"s, about NetworkManager, but definitely don't have any sympathy about the documentation situation. Even more so if you've offered to help and they won't even consider that. That puts documentation into the hands of isolated third parties who will be doing black-box analysis to try and explain how it works, and writing information which will fall out of date when the application changes. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
