On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 08:12 +0000, mike cloaked wrote: >> I do now know that if sending a plaintext mail from Evo to TB then the >> signature verifies just fine, but changing to sending HTML but >> otherwise leaving everything else the same then TB says it is a BAD >> signature. The question I do not know is whether the signature >> verification in TB has a bug, or whether Evo does not form the >> PGP/Mime mail correctly when sending HTML? > > Can TB verify Evo's signed message in your Sent folder? Can gpg verify > it, independantly of TB? > > If they can, but won't verify the received message, then possibly > somewhere along the line the HTML is being reflowed or in some way > modified, which would destroy the signature. I can't really see how that > could happen, but just to eliminate it as a possibility, try saving both > the sent mail and the received mail to files and do a simple diff on > them. I will try and test as you suggest this evening when I have finished with $DAYJOB for today.... -- mike c -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
