Re: AppArmor about to be merged into the kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10-03-22 01:46:10, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Some people will point out that AppArmor comes from the Novell 
> > folks and is already integrated with openSUSE.  They would also 
> > remind folks of the collaboration between Novell and Microsoft.
> >
> > So, when reading the various comparisons make sure you know which
> > bias may be in play.
> 
> Heh.  That's a good point, but I would remind all of you that SELinux
> comes from No Such Agency.
> 
> Which Evil is the Lesser?

Of the TLAs, the NSA is the only one that has ever earned our trust, at 
least in matters of security.  The classic example comes from DES, 
which NSA changed slightly for reasons they would not disclose.  A 
decade or two later, differential attacks were publicly discussed, and 
it turned out that DES was immune to them because of the NSAs changes 
to it.  Trust is earned, and NSA as earned it as other TLAs have failed 
to.  All of SELinux is public and open, and it will all have been 
looked at and commented on by very untrusting people.

AFAIK, and I really don't, AppArmor is like locking the front door to 
one's house, and possibly locking the back door as well if one 
remembersto, while normal *nix security (permissions) is more like 
putting the valuable data into a safe, so it is locked even if a window 
is left open.  SELinux uses the *nix model, of locking the inode, not 
the pathname to the inode.  AIUI, Security people object to AppArmor as 
being fundamentally insecure, so if SELinux worked that way, it would 
have been about as much effort as it has been without any real 
security.  But what do I know.

-- 
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:'                       <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
      '                              <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux