On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 20:04 -0600, Mikkel wrote: > On 03/04/2010 06:27 PM, Craig White wrote: > > I would submit that only a very tiny amount of people would actually do > > what you are trying to do (use gmail as a smarthost). > > > > Yes, it would be worth it if you leave a trail behind in case anyone > > else wants to do that. > > > If you think of it that narrowly, then you are correct. But if you > take it as an example on how to set up using a smart host with sasl, > then you have a wider audience. > > For that matter, you get people like me, that 3 different smart > hosts, depending on the email address doing the sending. Then there > is the general relay host for the mail that does not match those > rules. Because this setup is on my home network, I can not send the > mail directly from here. For some reason the DSL IP addresses are on > the DUN list. ;) ---- I was just generally referring to the issue of smarthost = gmail which has nothing to do with SASL as far as I could imagine. For that matter, smarthost setup really has nothing to do with SASL. I am definitely certain that few can match your ingenuity if you are doing 3 smarthost routing methods based upon sender e-mail address because you already know that while you are providing testimony to postfix's flexibility, it was not really designed to scratch that itch. I can appreciate that it is probably not the easiest thing to get DSL IP addresses, especially dynamically assigned addresses out of Taiwan to be recognized as smtp sources these days... even if you get the e-mails delivered, I would suspect that the spam score would make it somewhat difficult. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
