On 03/03/2010 06:58 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > As usual, Craig White cannot ever be wrong. I had a wife like that, 25 years > ago. When she left, I bought a 6 pack to celebrate. My penance in hell was > over. > > But I will state this real simply as a question: This machine, a slow 2.1Ghz > quad core phenom, with 4GB of dram, after rsync'ing the F10 32 bit install > from a DD configured drive, to one I configured, has remained much faster > than the DD configured install ever managed. Using ccache, 12 to 14 minute > kernel compiles are now in the 3 to 5 minute range as one example. > > So I ask, what miss-configuration that DD was in charge of on the original > install, could slow a machine down that badly? > > Seems like a good enough question to deserve a factual answer. > I had a setup behaved like that. The difference was caused by moving the SATA drive from one system to another. The second system supported 3.0 Gbps and the first one only supported 1.5 Gbps. I have also seen it when someone had installed the jumper that limited the drive to 1.5 Gbps. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
