On 10-03-02 22:43:13, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 18:20:37 -0800, > Don Quixote de la Mancha <quixote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > If the only problem was that some sectors got remapped, it > > shouldn't be failing any of the tests. At worst, it would simply > > report that the remapping had taken place, but that the test had > > passed. > > If you have pending reallocations you can get errors on the surface > scans. And one often needs to write a block to allow for > reallocation to occur, so these can sit around for a while. Palimpsest is worse than that. It claims a disk that has any *reallocated* sectors is bad. -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
