Re: Help Diagnose Slow Disc Access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Kam Leo <kam.leo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Failing the "quick" test and long completion times are sure signs that
> the drive is in trouble. You can try reformatting the drive to see if
> that improves performance (doubtful). Good luck finding a new IDE
> drive. You might have to use a SATA drive with a SATA-IDE adapter or
> buy a SATA controller and change all your hard drives to SATA.

Both SATA controllers and SATA drives are cheap and easy to find, and
there are many, many advantages to SATA over parallel IDE.

Didn't you say that the placement of drives in your case was
constrained somehow?  One of the most significant advantages of SATA -
in fact the main reason we now use so many kinds of serial busses now,
rather than the parallel busses of old, is that SATA cables can be
quite long, and are thin and flexible.  So you could put SATA drives
anywhere you needed to and just get a long cable.

An internal SATA to external eSATA adapter only costs ten bucks.  With
that and an eSATA enclosure for fifteen or twenty dollars, you could
put your drives entirely outside your computer case.  That's what I
use for my two disk-to-disk backup drives: I leave one connected to
eSATA and the other in a bank safe deposit box.  Once a week I swap
them.  The bank is quite some ways from my home, so even a direct
nuclear strike on my home office would not cause the loss of more than
a week's worth of my work.

SATA CD and DVD burners are quite cheap now.  I bought a Pioneer
Dual-Layer DVD burner for sixty bucks, that I think can now be had for
forty.  I recently bought a SATA Plextor Blu-ray burner, that can burn
Dual-Layer Blu-rays that hold 50 GB.  The unit only set me back I
think $230.  I intend to use that to make Blu-ray copies of my
Disk-to-Disk backup drives, that will only require a few (but
expensive) disks to hold my entire career's worth of data.

A little over a year ago I bought four one-terabyte Western Digital
RE3 (RAID Edition) drives for the AMCC 3ware 9690 RAID 5 in my F11
box.  Those were really high end drives, yet only cost $200 apiece.
Just your basic commodity drive, not a RAID Edition, would have
similar capacity for about half the price.

Finally SATA allows for better logical protocols, such as Tagged
Command Queueing, which allows multiple I/O transfers to be issued in
rapid succession, without having to wait for one to complete before
issuing the next.  With parallel IDE, the entire bus is completely
tied up for the whole duration of a single command.

There are lots of SATA controllers that support Linux these days.  A
two-port SATA Host Bus Adapter (HBA is the correct name, not
"controller") would cost maybe twenty bucks.  I have a couple
four-port Promise SATA HBAs, and they have never given me any trouble.
  The HBAs can have from two to eight or so ports, and may have some
internal ports and some external eSATA ports.  eSATA is electrically
identical to internal SATA; it just uses a different connector than
the internal.

SATA allows such long cables because it uses twisted pairs for each
data channel, with differential signalling.  Twisted pairs tend to
cancel out electrical interference all by themselves, whereas
differential signalling eliminates common-mode pickup.  So a
differential twisted pair cable can be quite long, and used in very,
very electrically-noisy environments with no data transmission errors
at all.

Besides SATA, USB and FireWire use differential twisted pairs, as does
Serial Attached SCSI (SAS).  SAS uses the same cabling as SATA does,
but with the SCSI logical protocol.  The basic SATA uses the same
logical protocol as parallel IDE, so much of the industry's existing
investment into parallel IDE firmware and device drivers can still be
used for SATA - one reason that it's so cheap.

Please take my advice, my friend: the *last* thing you ever want to do
is store valuable data on a hard drive that you're not completely
confident of.  While it is merely slow today, tomorrow it may start
irretrievably losing data.  You might not be able to tell right away
that you have lost data, because you might not actually look at the
corrupted files until much later on.

(I've spent seven years doing all manner of storage programming.  If
there is one thing I know about, it is failed hard drives.)

Don Quixote
-- 
Don Quixote de la Mancha
quixote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.dulcineatech.com

   Dulcinea Technologies Corporation: Software of Elegance and Beauty.
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux