Paolo
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Reid Rivenburgh <reidr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Paolo Galtieri <pgaltieri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:True. But it does look suspicious. I know measuring actual memory
> I agree that the numbers don't prove it one way or the other. I was just
> pointing out that showing numbers doesn't help.
usage is a bit of a black art, though, so I can believe it's not an
issue.
That does sound bad. If you're bored, you could try running the 3.6
> As to the issues with firefox it could be flash, but the previous version of
> firefox, given the same open tabs and content didn't show such high CPU
> usage as soon as it starts. I'm running the 64 bit firefox and it really
> sucks when it comes to sites which use flash heavily it crashes repeatedly.
version proved by the remi repository:
http://blog.famillecollet.com/pages/Config-en
I'm running that, but I too am seeing constant CPU usage with lots of
tabs up (10-30%), so no promises! Maybe it'll at least be more
stable.
reid
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines