Re: Routing problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/18/2010 10:01 AM, Rick Sewill wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 07:31 +0100, j.halifax . wrote: 
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Could you please help me with routing in the LAN default GW box?
>>
>> I have 
>> eth0 connected to Internet 
>> eth2 to internal LAN 10.255.250.0 
>> LAN default GW is 10.255.250.37
>> eth3 connected to other LAN

What is the address of the subnet "other LAN" ?

There seem to be two more subnets, 192.168.180.0 and 172.17.0.0.

Andrew.



>> Route in the default GW (10.255.250.37):
>>
>> Destination       Gateway           Genmask         Flags Metric Ref  Use Iface
>> 192.168.180.0   *                       255.255.255.0   U      0      0        0  eth3
>> 10.255.250.0     *                       255.255.255.0   U      0      0        0  eth2
>> link-local           *                       255.255.0.0      U     1003   0        0  eth0
>> link-local           *                       255.255.0.0      U     1004   0        0  eth2
>> link-local           *                       255.255.0.0      U     1005   0        0  eth3
>> 172.17.0.0       192.168.180.100  255.255.0.0      UG    0      0        0  eth3
>> default             dsl-router            0.0.0.0             UG    0      0        0  eth0
>>
>> >From the LAN default GW (10.255.250.37) 
>> - I can ping 172.17.1.50:
>>   PING 172.17.1.50 (172.17.1.50) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>   64 bytes from 172.17.1.50: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=5.62 ms
>>   64 bytes from 172.17.1.50: icmp_seq=2 ttl=253 time=3.29 ms
>>
>> >From other boxes in the same LAN (e.g. 10.255.250.38)
>> - I cann't ping 172.17.1.50
>> - I cann't traceroute 172.17.1.50: It goes to LAN default GW 
>>   10.255.250.37 and then to its default GW dsl-router on eth0
>>   instead of eth3 (so that the routing rule for 172.17.0.0 doesn't 
>>   match for 172.17.1.50)
>>
>> Can anybody help pleasee?
>> Thank you so much!
>> jh
>>
> 
> Your problem has me stumped.
> 
> The only thing I can think of is to ask how iptables is set up.
> 
> I think you have iptables doing masquerading to the eth0 interface.
> The masquerading shouldn't be the problem.
> 
> Are you doing anything special with packets coming in eth2 in iptables?
> 
> I assume 10.255.250.38 can ping the Internet so you have routing set up.
> 
> I can't think of anything else to check at this moment.
> 
> Hopefully others will have better suggestions and ideas where to look.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux