1 correction and a few typos removed: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Marcel Rieux <m.z.rieux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Marcel Rieux <m.z.rieux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Updates were available: >> >> Total size: 181 M >> Is this ok [y/N]: y >> Downloading Packages: >> Running rpm_check_debug >> ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: >> kernel-uname-r = 2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64 is needed by (installed) >> kmod-nvidia-2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64-190.42-1.fc11.1.x86_64 >> kernel-uname-r = 2.6.30.9-99.fc11.x86_64 is needed by (installed) >> kmod-nvidia-2.6.30.9-99.fc11.x86_64-190.42-1.fc11.2.x86_64 >> kernel-uname-r = 2.6.30.9-102.fc11.x86_64 is needed by (installed) >> kmod-nvidia-2.6.30.9-102.fc11.x86_64-190.42-1.fc11.3.x86_64 >> Complete! >> (1, [u'Please report this error in http://yum.baseurl.org/report']) > > The problem apparently is kmod-nvidia-2.6.30 is looking for kernel > 2.6.30 which has been automatically uninstalled (God knows when) > because newer kernels have been installed. > > Go to : Administration => Add/Remove software => look for > kmod-nvidia-2.6.30 => remove. > > Now, why kmod-nvidia suddenly asks for a driver that isn't available a kernel that isn't available, of course! > anymore or why kmod-nvidia hasn't been remvoed at the same time as the > kernel. I don't know. > > Now, since the problem is about a package from rpmfusion, I understand > Fedora has nothing to do with it. Since I'm such an expert in the > domain, I should write to rpmfusion and have a discussion with them. > After all, this problem has been covered time and again since, at > least Fedora 11, and they're certainly unaware of it. > > What I'm sure of, though, is that the day a reviewer from the standard > press -- you know, the kind of paper most people read -- encounters the > problem, Fedora will once again be claimed "not ready for prime time". > > And this is, of course, is normal. It's exactly the kind of silliness > that make experts claim that "Fedora is for experts". > > So, this is how the market share evolves: > > May 2009: > > Windows 93.18% > Mac 4.73% > Linux 1.17% > > <http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=8&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=124> > > January 2010: > > Windows 92.00% > Mac 5.16% > Linux 1.02% > > <http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=8&qpcal=1&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=132> > > Then, you write to TVs to tell them that Linux is climbing up the > charts and that they should provide video in a Linux compatible > format. > > Excuse the rant but is there any fact I got wrong? -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
