[slightly OT] rpm Vs deb [Was: Re: Moblin is dead, Fedora on netbooks?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 02/16/2010 02:58 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>>  (1) Curious about why you say Moblin is dead? I missed the announcement!
>>
>>  (2) I'm writing this on a EeePC 1000HA (1GB, 160GB - but I'm using less
>>  than 20G) running F12 very nicely.
>
> Moblin and Maemo are merging to produce one project using the best bits
> of each to produce a single distro
>
> 	www.meego.com
>
Sorry for hijacking the thread but I wanted to point something out to the fedora 
folk out here who have not yet heard this -- MeeGo intends to use rpm instead of 
deb for package management (yay !).

However, there's been a considerable amount of community bashing taking place 
out on the MeeGo mailing list by current Maemo community members who are partial 
to dpkg. A lot of the reasoning goes like this ....

...rpm has dependency issues ...
...rpm is slower than dpkg ...
...dpkg is more capable/stable/flexible than rpm ...

Now, the reason I bring this up here is, I assume most people here have come to 
rely on and love yum (which is more like the front-end to something that, IMHO, 
most users don't use these days -- rpm). As a package management system, I think 
rpm is just as capable (if not more) than dpkg. However, the discussion on MeeGo 
is turning out to be very biased, with even an active dpkg maintainer chiming in 
with an offer to help (professionally too !) work out any possible issues 
related to adopting dpkg[1].

As someone who would love to work on MeeGo without having to try various 
hacks[2] to get a dev setup on a Fedora box, and also someone who would like to 
simply bring some balance in the conversation I mentioned, I request people with 
more rpm knowledge than mine to join the MeeGo list and participate in the thread.

cheers,
- steve

[1] http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-dev/2010-February/000085.html

[2] http://blog.gbraad.nl/2009/11/maemo-5-sdk-on-fedora-12.html

Although it might have worked when that ^^^^ post was written, the present 
installer script of the maemo sdk is broken on fedora because it first checks 
for apt, and if that fails, just works with .tgz archives but still makes a lot 
of assumptions about the install environment:

http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=34924&page=2

-- 
random non tech spiel: http://lonetwin.blogspot.com/
tech randomness: http://lonehacks.blogspot.com/
what i'm stumbling into: http://lonetwin.stumbleupon.com/
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux