Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548989 was CLOSED on Jan 21st, with the note that glibc-2.11.90-10 was in RAWHIDE. Should a bug be marked CLOSED before the fix makes it into release? My FC11 system, updated a few days ago, shows glibc-2.10.2-1.i686, and both my FC12 machines have locked up and I haven't gone to reboot them. I am/will not run RAWHIDE on those systems, FC12 is unstable enough. The question is one of policy, should a bug be marked CLOSED before the average user is FIXED? Meaning the fix is actually RELEASED. Note: caps are not shouting, that's bugzilla speak as it was sent to me. -- Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
