Mike Wright wrote: > Mike Wright wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm currently on f10 using their firefox 3.0.15 build to which I've >> installed firebug. I don't know whether firebug or firefox is the >> culprit but the site displays correctly using Galeon and Chrome (with >> firebug). I'd like to determine if it's the site's problem or that of >> Firefox/Firebug but it smells like a bug in the site's javascript. >> I can login the the capitalone web site using either firefox or chrome under F10 using firefox 3.0.15. I do however have the sun version of java installed. When I go to http://www.javatester.org/version.html it shows: Java Version 1.6.0_12 from Sun Microsystems Inc. inside the rectangular box. At least back when I installed F10, I still found many sites that didn't work properly with the default java configuration. In particular, the Dell DRAC 5 card web interface didn't work. I'll be going to F12 soon, so I'll see what happens there. Nataraj >> The problem occurs when I try to use CapitalOne's web site. It has >> worked mostly well since 2007 but been on the fritz for a couple of >> months now. >> <snip /> >> Would somebody be so kind as to try this link using Firefox (preferably >> 3.0.15) and let me know their result? >> >> https://servicing.capitalone.com/c1/login.aspx >> >> There is supposed to be a login block on the left side of the page. >> > > Firstly, thanks to everybody who took the time to help. > > I, too, got a javascript is not installed error but I know for a fact > that it's there because I use it extensively. > > I disabled firebug and firephp: that was not the culprit. So I > re-enabled them and used them to see what I could see. I saw a lot. > > Using the element inspector I hovered over the area where the login box > was supposed to appear and it "lit up": that means it's there. > Exploring deeper I found an <iframe> that was set to display: none; > however, it did contain the login form, so I did a little inline html > editing and changed it to display: block and voila', there it was and it > was functional. > > Looking at the site's javascript I found it erroring out on something > called busybox as undefined. That is definitely an error but whose I > don't know. Is busybox supposed to be native to the browser or is it a > piece of cap1's js? That I can't tell you. > > But at least I can force the site to behave by modifying their content > "on the fly". Bet they never anticipated somebody doing that ;D > -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
