Bill Davidsen wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Bill Davidsen wrote: >>> Just to be clear, I am not complaining that real cdrecord is not included, >>> I'm complaining that something else which works differently is called >>> cdrecord, and if I forget to put in the real thing I wind up with f___ing >>> $3 Blu-Ray coasters! I don't care if it is compatible at the command line >>> level, just that it is compatible at the "works correctly" level. >> >> Don't use wodim for Blu-Ray (nor DVDs), use growisofs, that's what it's for. >> http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/Blu-ray/ >> >> K3b only ever uses cdrecord or wodim for CDs. For DVDs, and in the latest >> beta version which adds Blu-Ray support, for Blu-Ray, it uses growisofs >> instead. It does that for a reason. >> > Well, the reason appears to be that cdrecord is not available in Fedora unless > you install it yourself, Fedora has chosen to take the respected cdrecord name > and put wodim in its place. This seems to me as ethical as selling replica Rolex > watches, the user get something other than what they expect. > > Real cdrecord seems to work correctly for Blu-Ray, and user would be far better > served by not having any cdrecord in a Fedora system at all, and letting > rpmfusion provide the real thing. > > I would not be unhappy without cdrecord, I can supply it. Having a program > pretending to be cdrecord which doesn't do Blu-Ray and seems not to do SVCD (I > only tried a few, the files worked with real cdrecord) correctly. No, not much > demand for SVCD. I fully agree with You, and I interpellate too for relegation of real cdrecord on rpmfusion. With actual excuse I have many problems, as well as many peoples in my neighbourhood. Franta -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
