Re: radeon driver heading in wrong direction :-(.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 31 January 2010 14:25:39 Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 20:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > In my case, none of the above...
> 
> Oh, come on!
> I'm using the same binary driver as you are.
> And yes, nVidia binary driver, while -far- better than ATI's driver,

Lesser of two evils, right? ;-)

> has
> had it's share of issues.
> E.g.
> - Initial F12 xorg + nVidia driver combo resulted in unbelievably slow
> performance under KDE.

But this is worked around by now. Unbelievable, given the fact that those are 
actually closed source drivers, yes? :-)

> - Legacy driver releases tend to lag the "current" driver badly. In a
> desktop, you could always switch to the latest version, but you laptop
> still carries a GF5600M, you're more or less screwed.

Umm, my initial comment that spawned this part of the thread was about advice 
on buying *new* cards, not buying *old* cards. If you want to buy an old card, 
feel free to buy a new Intel card instead, you'll get the same level of 
performance.

> - Xen kernel were never supported by nVidia.

You want 3D graphics in a virtual environment? To what purpose? Playing quake3 
on a mail/web/file-server under a virtual machine?

> - Having to compile a kernel without 4K stacks for months, until nVidia
> added support for it.

As compared to ATI not providing support for current version of X for the same 
number of months and still counting? Tricky question: what is easier --- 
recompiling a kernel, or downgrading X? :-)

>  .... Again, nVidia is doing an admirable job at keeping their drivers
> stable and current (compared to say, ATI or Intel Poulsbo), but claiming
> the using them do not come at a price, is ridicules, at best.

Fair enough. But this price is lower then in ATI and Intel case, at any rate. 
It's not perfect, but is just the best offer available.

Best, :-)
Marko


-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux