Re: Curiosity re: abrt ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:16:22 -0500, William wrote:

> Hi;
> 
> I was just wondering what happens to the abrt generated bugs.
> 
> As a practical matter, are they treated any differently from a manually
> filed bugzilla report?  Does abrt's reports have a higher priority?

If and only *if* the reports are more detailed [and more complete] than
manually filed ones, they are more useful and are likely to get priority
treatment from a package maintainer.

Recently, however, there have been many close-to-useless reports from
ABRT. With backtrace attachments created with dozens to hundreds of
missing -debuginfo packages. Without any steps on how to reproduce a
problem. Also, I've learned that an increasing number of users delete
tickets in ABRT immediately after they have submitted them to bugzilla,
even if missing relevant details.

> I seem to be generating a lot of abrt reports.  I cancel about
> two-thirds of them because I don't think the particular application was
> at fault, but that the crash was brought on by a buggy old f*rt user --
> e.g. hitting the wrong key or changing my mind and cancelling an
> operation.

Doubtful. Cancelling/interrupting something should not make the software
crash. Well-written software can deal with well-defined interruptions and
can either retain a sane sate or exit gracefully.
Some pieces of software, however, e.g. rapidly developed Python programs,
don't handle interruptions (such as Ctrl+C) everywhere and exit with
fatal run-time errors instead (Python Exceptions, which trigger ABRT, too).

> I am having some second thoughts that maybe I should be sending these
> type of errors along as well.  I think I remember reading somewhere in
> life's manual that the world should even be able to accommodate old
> f*rt's mistakes.

If you can provide the steps on how to reproduce an issue (in addition
to the backtrace details), the software developers ought to have interest
in that.
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux